CHANNEL RESTORATION IN AN URBAN SALMONID
STREAM (CONT.)
CONCLUSION
This project resulted in the restoration of stream function
and form for over 200 m (600 ft) of Sulphur Creek.
The stream is no longer straight, and the high right bank
is no longer delivering sediment to the “Redding
Redds”. The channel is still incised within
the alluvial valley but within that area there are now
two gentle meanders with riffle and pool features.
Because the natural gradient and substrate has been restored,
the channel is now more accessible to juvenile salmonids
which migrate downstream during seasonal low flows, and
structures along the bank now provide resting areas during
high flows. During the winter of 1999-2000, the
stream “settled in”, scour pools formed as
intended, and many other changes occurred in the channel.
The removal of the excess sediment within the streambed
resulted in channel adjustment approximately 200 m upstream
from the restoration reach. The stream “head
cut” through previously embedded bed materials,
and this change in the channel led to the formation of
gravel bars. The composition of the bars is desirable
spawning material. Because the aggraded streambed
was lowered during restoration, the backwater from the
Sacramento River remains in the lowest portion of the
project reach for a longer period during the dry summers,
and this also aids in the escapement of salmon juveniles.
Streamside vegetation is quickly establishing now that
more water is available during the summers.
Ideally, the entire sandbar should have been completely
removed. However, a small section of the sandbar
was left in the upper portion of the project reach due
to a combination of time constraints, lack of funds, and
the presence of mature cottonwoods nearby (there were
concerns that disturbing the soil too close to the cottonwoods
would damage their root systems). The stream has
subsequently incised the left bank of the sandbar.
This section of sandbar will probably continue to erode
as the stream reaches equilibrium. Both bends in
the completed channel have scour pools and much habitat
complexity among the vegetated riprap and rootwads.
There is overhanging vegetation and cover, and the different
species of willow and other native plants have created
a diversified riparian habitat.
The boulder cluster was subsequently buried by sand and
gravel. The boulders did not encourage scour nor
did they provide any habitat value. As expected,
the backwater effect coupled with the sediment load caused
the boulder cluster to behave more like a dam, forming
a gravel bar both upstream and downstream.
The cross-overs occurred where they were expected.
The meander that was designed for the channel worked well,
and the rootwad and vegetated riprap structures along
the streambanks were also accurately designed. The
elevation of the rootwads with the water level coincided
with critical fishery periods in this seasonal stream.
At one section of the stream, there was approximately
10 m (30 ft) of visible bank erosion. This was not
the result of improper alignment of the channel, but was
the result of insufficient bank protection in this section.
During one of the organized “planting days”,
volunteers built a 10 m long (30 ft) brush mattress to
protect this bank. However, the mattress was not
properly secured at the upstream portion to contend with
high flows. The flows got around behind the mattress
and the entire mattress was ripped from the bank, a common
predicament if a brush mattress is not firmly secured.
However, a 3.3 m (10 ft) long brush mattress that was
constructed by Watershed Restoration students on the opposite
bank did very well, surviving extremely high velocities,
with abundant growth of willows. This brush mattress
was specifically secured to existing vegetation on the
bank, and firmly secured to the bank so that the high
flows would not scour behind it.
Figure 9 and 10. It is sometimes difficult
to envision the dynamic changes that will occur after
channel restoration in a seasonal stream, such as the
formation of point bars. It is interesting to
realize that while the gravels composing the point bars
will move through the system, the point bars will still
remain. These two photos show the changes that
occurred in the new channel after the first large storm
event.
REVEGETATION SUCCESS:
Supplemental irrigation was not available for the project,
and summers in Redding are typically very hot and dry,
with no rainfall. As a result, almost all container
plants that were planted high up on the banks in hot,
exposed areas failed, with the exception of a few drought-tolerant
species. The majority of the rooted container plants
(cottonwood, elderberry, and upland species) had higher
survival rates in partially shaded areas. Contrary
to expectations, willow container plants did not have
a higher survival rate than willow stakes, although all
seemed to survive better in shaded areas rather than hot,
exposed areas. The deeply planted live pole cuttings
and brushlayers were very successful, with a 90% success
rate. These were planted deeply into the vadose
zone. It was also interesting to note that willow
cuttings and basket sedges had survived over a month of
complete inundation from the backwater. Almost all
of the cottonwoods (poles and container plants) that were
inundated under the backwater were eaten by beavers.
Two of the modified live siltation structures failed
when the 10 m (30 ft) section of bank scoured, but two
persisted and are growing vigorously and behaving like
small vegetated bendway weirs. These structures
survived the first season, although they were inundated
for at least a month by backwater, they withstood an estimated
4 m3/sec (12 cfs) velocities, and they were buried only
about .3 m (1 ft) into the channel. The experimental
brush box, which consisted of live stakes and dead brush,
was partially washed away, although what remained was
growing well.
The native grasses achieved about 70% cover and were
going to seed after 1 year. There were not many
weeds amongst the grasses. The basket sedges were
also establishing well, and have withstood extremely high
velocities. The biodegradable straw erosion control
blankets actually did biodegrade in one season.
The basket sedges planted in the blankets did not survive,
but this was probably due to the dry location on the upper
left bank. Cattails and rushes are naturally revegetating
the stream channel.
The stream is now more accessible to visitors since there
is now a gently sloping right bank where there was once
an unstable vertical bank. The left bank is also
more accessible now that the non-native blackberry growing
in the sandbar has been removed. Students from kindergarten
to college will be able to view the project (and migrating
salmonids) and hear presentations from Turtle Bay Museum
guides on the various aspects of stream restoration and
natural resource management.
REFERENCES
McCullah, J. M., 2000. Bio Draw 1.0 – Compendium
of Biotechnical Soil Stabilization Practices, Salix
Applied Earthcare.
Rosgen, D., 1996. Applied River Morphology, Wildland
Hydrology.
PREVIOUS PAGE
|